6 Comments
User's avatar
Strabo's avatar

Thanks Cams - your posts really do add to the experience of reading the novel.

Noreen G's avatar

The conversation of gestures between Kolya and the train driver had me laughing. Yury leaning out of the window; I could picture that scene in a movie. Pasternak’s descriptions are so visual.

Thanks so much for these posts Cams. They really help clarify and tie everything together. I appreciate you explaining the Russian history as well.

Alison Macaulay's avatar

Thanks as ever for this. I think this was my favourite section so far. I loved the strange goings-on in the villages, and I *really* loved the scene with the ironing. All that unspoken tension. I wondered about whether Tonya's response to Yuri's letter was actually her understanding something that he hadn't even noticed yet, and thereby creating the seed of an idea in his head. Female intuition, or just iinsecurity? Dunno.

The lynching scene was also great - that banality created by war, when lives become meaningless.

Thanks also for the Figes recommendation - I loved Natasha's Dance, so will definitely hunt that one down.

Saudith Durango's avatar

I'm on the same boat as other readers: what was Tony's letter all about? I didn't see that reaction coming and don't know what to make of adult mother Tonya. In modern days, I guess that's the equivalent to dump your husband -and father of your child- via text?

I didn't see Yuri's confession coming either -seems I can't predict anything here, which I love!-, can imagine Lara at the receiving end of that conversation, trying to deal with her own reaction, the ironing, her leave.

Gintz death: what an absurd way to lose your life, because of your words. It read so simple: stumble, fall, get a bullet, get lynched.

Context always helps, thanks Cams.

Looking forward to the Tonya-Yuri encounter, if it even happens.

Margo's avatar

Tonia’s letter to Yury really threw me!!! Tell your husband to go to another woman???

Christina's avatar

Listening to your video (and reading the essay at the same time—thank you for offering several formats!) really helped me understand this chapter and its historical background much better. I appreciate it.

While reading and listening, two characters stood out to me in this chapter: the deaf man on the train and the government official. Both of them seem to approach the situation in an idealistic way, somewhat detached from reality, and without much real experience. Because of this, they both try to intervene in events that are far bigger and more complex than they can really grasp.

Commissar Gintz, in particular, felt like someone who was deaf to warnings—he was repeatedly told not to deliver the dangerous speech, but he ignored all advice and went ahead anyway.